The weekend before last, as the race for mayor of Grand Rapids came down to the wire, a brouhaha boiled up between the two major contenders, incumbent George Heartwell and challenger Rick Tormala. Tormala took Heartwell to task for a postcard that Big Sister's campaign had mailed only to Catholics. The card had Heartwell mugging in front of well-known Catholic landmarks in the city such as St. Adalbert's Basilica and listed the endorsements of prominent members of the local clergy. Naturally, connecting Hizzoner, Catholic religious imagery, and the endorsements of well-known priests and nuns gave the impression (a superficial one, at least) that Heartwell received the thumb's up from the Catholic Church, or if not that, he was in accord with the key political positions of the Church -- namely, the right-to-life issues (i.e., abortion, assisted suicide, and experimentation on human embryos).
Tormala, a Catholic who was the only candidate in the race who had received the Michigan Right to Life endorsement, objected to the postcard as dishonest. It certainly is. Even though Heartwell has refused to publicly declare his stand on abortion and other right-to-life issues for fear of alienating pro-life voters, he had received the endorsement of the Progressive Women's Alliance. These liberated ladies make it plain that their first political priority at the top of the usual dreary list of "progressive" causes is "the right of privacy to make choices regarding reproductive freedom" -- i.e., the right to abortion. Indeed, no candidate for political office gets their blessing who does not support abortion-on-demand. So, Big Sister wasn't being square with Catholic votes and his postcard targeted at them was a sleazy campaign ploy.
Of course, Tormala should have clubbed Hizzoner over the head with this, as he did. But at the end of the day, it's the responsibility of voters to make sure they know where candidates stand on issues fundamental to them. If any Catholic voter was taken in by Heartwell's postcard, then he wasn't doing his homework. That said, one important aspect of this whole story was never raised by the candidates or the media: How did Heartwell know which Grand Rapids voters were Catholic so that he could target them? A voter's religion is not a matter of public record, so where did Heartwell get this private information? Who gave him the names and addresses of Catholics living in Grand Rapids? How did Big Sister come to know which voters are Catholic?
There are, of course, parish directories. If any of the Catholic clergy or laity supporting Heartwell provided his campaign with these directories, not only shame on them, the Grand Rapids diocese has a duty to ensure that there are consequences for abusing this information. Parishioners are not listed in these directories so that pandering politicians can track them down. The same goes to any business a parish or the diocese provides with mailing addresses of local Catholics. As it is doubtful in the extreme that church authorities would permit a business to sell or otherwise turn over that information to a political campaign, a business that did so should be prohibited from doing business with the Catholic Church.
It is certainly possible that no one in town abused a trust and gave the Heartwell campaign any lists of Catholics. A mailing list can be put together from commercial demographics that target households that fit a supposed Catholic profile, though it would be imprecise. If that is the case, then Big Sister is guilty of nothing more than dishonest pandering with his notorious postcard. Whatever IS the case, Heartwell should come clean. It is one thing for a candidate to broadcast messages to appeal to particular religious groups, and it's another thing for a candidate to gather private information about the religion of individual voters. We know Heartwell did the latter to pander, and now we should know how he did it. Was an abuse of trust involved or not?
And if Big Sister won't tell us, then there is always his list of campaign expenditures he must file with the city clerk that will tell us something. Either there will be a line item for the purchase of a mailing list or there won't. If he bought the list from a direct marketing firm, then there likely was no abuse of parish directories or other address information the Catholic Church maintains of parishioners. If there is no line item for that expense, then how did Heartwell's campaign get the information except from a source that had already compiled it and then handed it over?
This is the real story, and it's an important one.
Bill
Very nice job on this story and thanks for printing it to expose George Heartwell and his followers on his deceptive ways. Just to let you and your readers know that this story made it all the way to the National Catholic League. Check out catholicleague.org for an official response from president -William Donahue.
The following letter below was submitted to the Grand Rapids Press to address this issue. Unfortunatly for many area Catholics, the letter to the editor did not get printed. Hope you enjoy.
August 1, 2007
Letter to the Editor
I know that Mayor George Heartwell has always been a firm believer that the abortion debate does not belong in local politics and has been very consistent on avoiding answering publicly where he stands on this issue. However, after receiving a campaign brochure with of the picture of St. Mary’s steeple, the Basilica and prominent Catholics signatures endorsing his candidacy, one would believe that Mr. Heartwell is making the statement that he is strongly endorsed by, and committed to the Catholic Church. Since our Mayor is strategically marketing symbolic images to the faithful, wouldn’t it be responsible to let area Catholics know where he stands on the most important issue facing the Catholic community?
The fact is George Heartwell ideology and politics has never fallen in line with the Catholic Church. As a practicing Catholic, I am very disappointed with the individuals and clergy who know full well of Mr. Heartwell’s support of abortion and his involvement with Planned Parenthood, the Michigan Citizens For Stem Cell Research & Cures and the Progressive Woman’s Alliance, who only supports candidates who are Pro Choice.
This political dishonesty from a Mayor to fool Catholics is irresponsible, but for an ordained minister to broadcast this deception is an outrage. Please join me in supporting the only candidate in this year’s mayoral election who respects life and rights of the unborn, by voting Rick Tormala this August 7th.
Dan Tietema
Posted by: Dan Tietema | August 13, 2007 at 09:12 PM
Hi, Dan.
Good to hear from you again. We need another one of those good features you write. ;)
Like you, Bridget and I are Catholics. We weren't too bothered by Heartwell's dishonest pandering. We expect so little of him, although your point made to the G.R. Press about the higher standard Heartwell should adhere to as a Christian pastor is well taken. But I did start becoming concerned when I began thinking about how Heartwell got the addresses of Catholic voters.
The issue is relevant even though election is over, especially if the source of information is ultimately church records. I hope not. It is possible that Heartwell bought a commercially produced mailing list, although having some familiarity with mailing lists, I'm not sure how good such a list could be. We'll see. Whatever the source of the information, the dishonesty of Heartwell's posturing before Catholic voters deserves an explanation from him. (And is disheartening that the Catholic clergy who allowed their names to be used in service of this sleazy ploy haven't denounced it.)
Regards, Bill
P.S. It is interesting that the Press didn't run your well. I thought it was well-written and measured in tone. I'll have to talk to you further about it.
P.P.S. Thanks for the tip on the Catholic League's response to the Heartwell-Tormala dispute.
Posted by: The Executive Director | August 13, 2007 at 10:39 PM
Excellent article. Please keep on the story. We'd love to hear a follow-up when the campaign finance reports are filed.
Posted by: Joe | August 14, 2007 at 08:08 AM
While I am not Catholic my husband and his family are, and we all agree that this was WAY out of line.
And if the dioscese did release this information, shame on them. And if it were a business, then I agree that they shouldn't be allowed to do business with the Catholic church again. I don't think that's too much to ask for.
In fact, I think it's pretty disrespectful, and irreverent that Heartwell would go so far as to put his mug next to the Popes. Rude, rude, rude.
Posted by: Amie | August 14, 2007 at 04:01 PM
Thanks, Joe. We'll keep an eye on those campaign finance reports.
Hi, Amie. Yes, shame on anyone who abused information that ultimately came from church records, although I am certain the diocese did not permit such if it occurred.
As for Heartwell and his mug, I find that orange shirt the most annoying thing.
Regards, Bill
Posted by: The Executive Director | August 14, 2007 at 04:05 PM
Hey Bill & Bridget,
I think George is setting a new fashion standard for religious followers everywhere. What think you?
Instead of Papal Purple, the color of religious royalty, George is proudly wearing Mayoral Orange, the color of election mailing dishonesty. :-) Haa haa
Jeanette
Posted by: J. Bean | August 14, 2007 at 05:53 PM
I'll second that Jeanette.
--Nick
www.RightMichigan.com
Posted by: Nick | August 15, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Hello Jeanette & Nick,
I agree wholeheartedly.
We have sworn in the new color guard with Mr. Heartwell and a bright, vivid orange it is. Kind of like a space astronaut glass of "tang" colored orange juice. Or construction barrels in the summer in Michigan orange. Bomb pop ice cream orange. Creamsickle orange. Need I go on? No? Ok...I won't.
As for dishonest election mailing? Well...as someone noted earlier, it was questionnable for a man who is a minister to the people. He certainly was trying to sway the vote for those who may not know how radically different he is to them. So, I will go with misleading for sure. Definately in poor taste.
But, some people will do what it takes to get those extra votes. No matter what. When you get that all important victory, how you got there matters little to some with an ever changing value system.
Thanks for the feedback.
Regards,
Posted by: Bridget Dupont-Tingley, Editor @ L.A.W. | August 15, 2007 at 05:12 PM
Any chance that's the color of his (our) new car?
--Nick
www.RightMichigan.com
Posted by: Nick | August 16, 2007 at 08:48 AM
I hope not Nick. There are enough distractions on the road without a bright orange car driven by the Mayor himself hitting the roadways!
Regards,
Posted by: Bridget Dupont-Tingley, Editor @L.A.W. | August 16, 2007 at 11:02 AM